NOVEMBER - 2021CONSTRUCTIONTECHREVIEW.COM8IN MYOPINIONBy Raymond Kent, Principal, Director of the Innovative Technology Design Group, DLR GroupIoT, or Internet of Things, devices can generate up to trillions of data points per second depending on the ecosphere in which they inhabit.These devices are not necessarily stationary either.Some may move within a designated geography, while others roam as free in and out of an area as one could imagine simply by being attached to a person rather than a thing.Each of these devices is created by a host of manufacturers over potential several generations with varying degrees of interoperability, security, efficiency, and effectiveness.With over 31 billion, and growing, IoT devices deployed they per-meate almost every facet of our lives.It is anticipated that by 2025 over 75 billion devices will be generating petabytes of data per second.Impressive as this sounds, it still is less than .006% of "things" that can be connected and the race to fill that void is staggering.First coined in 1999 by Kevin Ashton, IoT did not really start its meteoric rise until just over a decade later when a Garner report (2011) listed it as a new and rising tech-nology.Since then, the AEC (Architecture/Engineering/Construction) industry embraced the possibilities of smart building technology in creating more efficient buildings that worked within parameters set by its occupants to accomplish many desired outcomes ­ sustainability being a leading one.As networks, storage, and IoT devices have improved, we have moved from an Internet where people were the primary client/customer, and the data generated by them and was analyzed after the fact.We have now moved to one where things reign supreme and the data is generated first and we need to sift through it to analyze it and decide what is useful and relevant.Out of this massive data cache, we have seen a division of IoT into five basic branches that each form their own unique universes, but as some suggest with our own Universe, cross over each other and can help or hinder.These include Consumer, Commercial, Industrial, Infrastructure, and Military.Within each of these applications, the technology deployed and the data collected generated several dilem-mas.The largest of these is who owns the data and who determines what is collected and how it is to be used.The best example of this is within our tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Apple, and others who target trillions of points of data of its users through the use of their services ­ passive or otherwise ­ that can then be parsed, analyzed, and monetized and has often been the target of privacy rights groups, yet we benefit from that data.We also have seen how that data can be used for nefarious intentions as well with the recent political unrest surrounding the Presi-dential Election in the US where data was used to monetize THE EVOLUTION OF THE MATRIX
< Page 7 | Page 9 >